Anti-Semitism Defined?

Here’s an interesting bit of Facebook dialogue inwhich the term ‘Anti-Semitism’ is rendered as incoherent as the term ‘Racism’. I liked it.

ME: Michael Chertoff’s family were Russian Jews; and in Russian the name “Chertoff” actually means, “devil”.

FRIEND A: To be specific, it translates to “Son of the Devil”.

ME: Jesus said:

“You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and stayed not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” (John 8:44)

… connection?

FRIEND B: Hi, [Ehud], please don’t take this the wrong way, but I do wonder, are you anti-semitic?

ME: To be honest, —–, I’m not even sure what the term means. Currently, Jewish organizations of every stripe are in agreement that “the New Testament constitutes classic anti-semitism”. If that’s the definition of ‘anti-semitic’, that just means that most Jews hate Jesus and his followers.

FRIEND B: Where did you get your quoted text, truthtellers.org? There is a world of difference between hatred and disagreement, and personally, I find that entire statement absurd. All the Jewish people I know (and I know many) live their lives like anybody else, worship in their own way and don’t concern themselves with hating Jesus or his followers.

According to Merriam-Webster, the definition of anti-semitism is: hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group.

ME: Well, Abe Foxman is the one who most recently defined the New Testament as ‘anti-semitic’:

“… [T]he anti-Jewish rhetoric that mars several books of the Christian New Testament has been shown to reflect not historical fact but the rivalry at the time the books were written between Jews who followed Jesus and those who did not…Although it is supposedly motivated by love for the Jews, this idea [that Jews should be converted] is inherently anti-Semitic in that it implicitly denigrates the value of Jewish belief.” (Foxman, NEVER AGAIN? THE THREAT OF THE NEW ANTI-SEMITISM)

But he’s far from alone on the issue. Really, its the standard position of Orthodox, Reform, and Conservative Rabbis alike.

The recognition of this as the official position of Judaism is in fact so standardized that the U.S. State Department’s new “Department of Global Anti-Semitism['s]” 40 page report on Anti-semitism condemns the New Testament on the grounds that it is “inherently anti-semitic”.

But your Mirriam-Webster definition begs an interesting question: In Hebrew it is the classic quandary of “mehu yehudi(?)” — who is a Jew? Since the modern Jewish world is comprised roughly of six separate racial groups, its hard to speak of them as a distinct “race”. And seeing as how most self-identifying Jews are actually Atheists, or non-religious, they cannot exactly be categorized as a religious identity either.

With these facts in mind, I can safely say that I do not discriminate against Jews as a race (most of them are Ashkenazi anyway — Caucasian, generally speaking) and neither do I discriminate against them as a religion, because they have no single religion.

I do however forthrightly admit to discriminating against JudaISM because I’m a serious Christian. I also freely admit to opposing the radical liberalism that self-described Jews promulgate in America and Europe.

This Ashkenazi tells the truth, people who call themselves ‘Jews’ are monolithically opposed to our Christian and American ideals:

He well admits that Judaism and the people who self-identify as Jews are naturally hostile to all races, nations and religions. The most noteworthy prerogatives of the people known as ‘Jews’ are infiltration, subversion, and destruction. Whatever ‘Jews’ are, they certainly aren’t friendly to our race, our country, nor to our King, Jesus. Such has been the case atleast since the Idumean infiltration and overthrow of Judea.

The Mamzer of Deuteronomy 23:2

A friend recently inquired of me:

“Hey, [Ehud], on Deuteronomy 23:3, does that have anything to do with race? I was reading on stormfront where someone mentioned it but I’d like to get your commentary.”

Here’s my brief response:

Absolutely. The word “Illegitimate” in Deut. 23:2 used to be translated “Bastard”. In the Septuagint (Grk.) the word is “Nothos”, meaning generally, “a mongrel”. So too did the Vulgate (Latin) use the related term “Nothus”, meaning “Mongrel”. And In the Masoretic text (Heb.) its “Mamzer”, meaning, among other things, “a mongrel” as well.

Even Luther picked up on this by translating it as “Mischling” (German), which has only one definition: “A Mongrel, one of mixed race”. And I think he very appropriately translates “assembly” as “the body politic” because mongrels weren’t banned from heaven, only from the Israelite nation.

If one studies enough he sees that this is really the only position one can take on the topic of the Mamzer because the bible itself forces you into a corner on this subject:

First, if someone hopes to say a Mamzer is one born of an un-wed union or other forms of illicit sex, we find that though Jephthah was born of a harlot (Judges 11:1), the Law in nowise impeded his ascension to the highest office in Israel. And no one suggests that it should have.

And on the other side of the issue we find that the Prophets Ezra and Nehemiah banished the mixed-children along with the foreign wives from the body politic. Matthew Henry says that this can only be explained by the case Law of Deuteronomy 23:2 and that the Prophets have given us the perfect interpretation of that Law by divine authority.

So if the Law didn’t lock out children of harlots but DID lock out mixed-race children, we are forced to accept that ‘Mamzer’ is in fact correctly defined as ‘a mixed-race Mongrel’.

And the truth is that most translators know this … but are unwilling to admit the fact. How do we know that they know it? Look at Zechariah 9:6; the same word (Mamzer/Nothos) is therein translated by our modern bibles as “mixed-race”, “mongrel-people”, etc. Its the SAME WORD but they translate it in a radically different way when the matter of ethnic exclusion is on the line.

And besides, the Septuagint (Grk.) gets pretty specific about what was going on in Ezra 9 where we read: “…they have not separated themselves from the allogenes (‘other races’) of this land, nor the akatharsia (‘both physical and mental impurity’) from the ethnoi (‘ethnicities’): the Canaanites, and Hittites, and Pheresites, and Jebusites, and Moabites, and Egyptians, and Edomites. For both they and their sons have lived with their daughters, and the separated seed is mixed with this ethne (‘ethnicity’) of allogenes (‘another race’) of this land…”

Ezra goes on and on in this sort of language, denouncing mixture with “allogenes”. Its important to note that Linguists agree that the word ‘allogenes’ is a composite of two other Greek words, allos (“other”) and genos (“races, lines of descent”).

and its also important to note that the list of ethnicities with which they are said to have mixed themselves includes many non-Canaanite peoples. This is important because people often argue that Israel was only supposed to remain separate from people “under the ban” of Canaan but that clearly isn’t true. Ezra states that Israelites mingling (maritally or nationally) with ANY other race was illicit.

That’s the best I can do off the top of my head – I hope it helps.

According to His Law, by His Grace,
~Ehud would

For the Fathers

The March of Cambreadth

This one needs no further commentary on my part. Suffice it to say that it definitely taps into something primal, a sense of peoplehood and a desperate responsibility for kith and kin.

Dick Gaughan

Wild Mountain Thyme:

This song revels in the natural community of our people. It beckons us back to our clannish agrarian roots– whether in the Cymbric Highlands or in the Western vales of Virginia– it bids us return.

If you hear that call… if you feel its pull on your soul, that means that our enemies haven’t fully succeeded in their plot to unitize and monetize you– to make you a rootless and raceless automaton to be spent like so many bricks in foundation of the Globalist Tower of Babel.

And this one is just as good, anti-Nationalist themes in the video notwithstanding.

The Father’s Song:

As a father myself, this one grabs me by the throat and won’t let go.

The idea that there are powers in high places which conspire directly against the lives of my children sets me to such a ferocious disposition that I oft struggle to contain its reveal on my face.

“Don’t ya’ let ‘em buy ya’ out or break your pride.
Don’t ya’ let yourself be used and cast aside.
If ya’ listen to their lyin’
they’ll con you into dyin.
And you won’t even know that you were once alive.”

God bless you my brothers and sisters. May the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ grant you peace amidst the storms of our present travail. May He prepare for you a table of feasting in the midst of our enemies.

And may you pass to the enemies of our ancestors and our children the bitter cup prepared from time immemorial for the Devil and his Angels.

A Conversation About Race

In this film Craig Bodeker highlights the hypocrisy of the Civil Rights vision of race relations. He powerfully obviates the fact that the concept of ‘Racism’ is incoherent and generally self-contradictory in its usage; its lack of intellectual and moral weight notwithstanding, the term is nevertheless become a cudgel which Social Marxists are using to bludgeon Christian civilization to the point of crisis.

Among other things, we find it apparent that our enemies will cry ‘Racism’ as long as the white race continues to exist but without the white race actual violence and strife between ethnic groups will rise sharply for no other people now or ever have demonstrated such humanitarian efforts. None else have ever demonstrated an inclination toward the lofty crusades inwhich our folk have engaged themselves for two millennia or more.

Moreover, its also clear that the white race and this concept of ‘Racism’ cannot forever coexist. If whites are to extenuate themselves beyond the next two centuries we must discard this Marxist-Egalitarian ethic for without our people’s self-effacement and philanthropy the human species (as a whole) faces very dark days ahead of it.

The Curse of The Covenant

This is a painful lesson in what occurs when our people forget their God. Women, Perverts and Foreigners rule them. And if they will not repent, they will be erased from the earth. (Deut. 28; Lev. 26)

Here’s  part two:

Zionism

This goes out to the folks I know who continue to allege that criticism of the state of Israel and the Jewish Shoah are but a recent phenomenon devoid of pre-1980s precedent. Enjoy.

G.W. Armstrong writing on the subject of Zionism in 1950:

To the President and Congress of the United States
Gentlemen: I respectfully represent:

1. That the Zionists seek to destroy our republican form of
government and to establish a socialist government in place of it;

(2)that they have involved us in two world wars in pursuance of this
plan;

(3) that they seek to acquire the fabulous wealth of the Dead Sea estimated at five trillion dollars, and of the Arabian oil fields estimated at six hundred billion dollars;

(4) that this wealth belongs to us and the British Empire by right of conquest;

(5) that the Zionists are traitors and should be punished as such.

(a) I allege that a majority of the immigrants who have entered our country since the First World War are socialists and communists;

(b) I allege upon information and belief that Herbert H. Lehman, Felix Frankfurter and several Congressmen and other officials are Zionist communists and citizens of the State of Israeli.

Geo. W. Armstrong.
April 29, 1950.

Remember, this was written in 1950. 

Calling All The Clans

We need more music like this.

A Kinist Movie?

This appears to be some serious Kinist entertainment.

Hunt For Gollum – Trailer One
by HuntForGollum